I live in Massachusetts and I was curious what the Fuck this could possibly mean and uh
Basically no one knows what’s in it and it’s maybe poison but Massachusetts is the only state that holds carbonated water to the same health and safety standards as regular water so LaCroix is just doing nothing and hoping there’s no consequences
The lawsuit also alleges that the chemicals in LaCroix “include limonene, which can cause kidney toxicity and tumors; linalool propionate, which is used to treat cancer; and linalool, which is used in cockroach insecticide.”
Okay so let’s get more information about these "scary” chemicals:
Linalool: it comes from a lot of chemicals, including citrus peels, lavender, and cinnamon
Propionate: it comes from literally every organic process
this shit is so tiring, y'all.
EVERYTHING IS MADE OF CHEMICALS
CHEMICALS ARE NATURALLY OCCURING IN NATURE
IF YOU SAW THE CHEMICAL BREAKDOWN OF A COMPLETELY NATURALLY OCCURRING FRUIT YOU WOULD SEE A LOT OF SCARY SOUNDING WORDS AND SOME CHEMICALS WHICH ARE INDEED TOXIC FOR CERTAIN THINGS ESPECIALLY IN HIGH CONCENTRATIONS AND QUANTITIES
Do I think food safety is important? Yeah. Do I think it’s good that beverage manufacturers are being held to a high standard? yeah.
Do I think La Croix should be put out of business for using naturally-occurring chemicals that come from fruit? fuck no
If you want to ban those chemicals from food, you’ll have a hard time finding anything to eat
I may not work at Starbucks anymore but that doesn't mean I'm gonna stop bitching about secret menus.
(and before someone asks, the TERFs threatening me over the TERF dog whistle post didn't get me fired, I quit during the union busting and when they cancelled my insurance long before that)
so i get this pizza from the local place that's mushroom and truffle oil. last week i ordered it with extra mushroom and when rhys went to pick it up the guy was like "was that a mistake? that would be a lot of mushroom"
rhys assured him it wasn't a mistake, i just REALLY like mushroom, so he put the extra on and finished it up
this week i ordered it again, rhys went to pick it up and pizza guy is like "i assumed since she ordered it again it wasn't too much mushroom so i actually put a little EXTRA on this time"
i can still see bits of the base, good sir, but a valiant effort
tempted to order double extra mushroom next time to really fuck with him
rhys says if i order double extra mushroom i have to go and pick it up because the pizza guy might snap and decapitate him with a pizza cutter
also the pizza guy thinks he's alexis because the orders are all in my name and he has too much anxiety to correct him which is very funny but also i can lean into this and just say i'm rhys (reese) since we both have neutral names
I just saw yet another debate over MSG sensitivity online.
The way I see it, the problem with MSG usage in processed food isn’t that it has MSG, just that it has a metric shit-ton of it.
I’m sensitive to MSG but I’m fine with it in the lower quantities that it occurs naturally in many foods - it’s just that the amount in, say, a bag of Doritos, or in the flavor packet in instant ramen, is enough to give me a very bad time. (And I was experiencing these bad times long before I ever heard of MSG sensitivity or knew that MSG was a thing, so I don’t think it’s a placebo effect.)
I have done some experiments to find where my threshold is and it’s kind of annoying to do; all I know is that it’s higher than nothing and lower than the amount used in a single-serving bag of Chili Cheese Fritos. (Plain Fritos don’t cause me a problem.)
Since MSG levels are never outright stated in a food’s nutrition label, it’s easier to just assume that if something lists MSG in its ingredients it uses too damn much and to have something else.
[ID: Tumblr reply from qwertystop asking, “found this and showed an acquaintance when MSG sensitivities came up in conversatoin - do you get problems from soy sauce, parmigiano-reggiano cheese, vegemite, boullion cubes, meat stocks, etc? Things which contain similarly extremely high levels of glutamic acid, but not as something isolated and added back in?]
Soy sauce, Parmesan cheese, no. Boullion cubes and meat stocks, it depends on whether they’ve had MSG added in or if they’re just full of the natural glutamates. Vegemite, I have no idea, I can’t stand the flavor of it.
I had an interesting conversation with someone about this where it seems plausible that the problem isn’t with the MSG itself but with the brain’s response to being overwhelmed by the concentrated flavor. Like, apparently MSG kept in gelatin capsules and swallowed doesn’t cause a problem, when the same amount tasted and spat out can.
Given that migraines are often a response to a sensory overload condition it seems like it could be the concentrated MSG flavor itself that’s the issue. My migraines tend to be triggered by protracted intense sounds and smells, so that feels plausible, anyway (although the specific symptoms I have when I eat MSG-laden foods are different than my usual migraines).
American electric kettles are slow because American houses are wired for 110 volt electrical sockets. Whereas UK sockets are 220 volts. UK kettles have literally twice the power as American ones.
I’m aware of that, and in fact said so just after the first picture. In that same paragraph you’ll see something which had nothing to do with US vs UK power.
How much faster? A few seconds? Nope, a full three-and-a-half minutes: 4 min 12 sec compared to 7 min 42 sec. Come on!
Waiting for nearly eight minutes - though the review states that this is “still faster than most stovetops”, that’s no compliment - defeats the reason for buying an electric kettle in the first place, and that electric kettle in particular.
Calling it “a beautiful kettle for your countertop” means nothing if it doesn’t do its job, and IMO an asking price of $150-plus for such an inefficient contraption is daylight robbery.
In the US the best way to get a ridiculously-fast boiling kettle is to get an induction stovetop. I did a couple of videos on this, first one of a 240V induction stove vs. a reasonably-fast dedicated kettle:
and then one of a 120V induction cooktop vs. the same electric kettle:
Basically, if you want fast tea, and can afford/have the ability to do it, get an induction stove; otherwise, get an induction hotplate. Either of those will work with a traditional stovetop kettle and be significantly faster than a dedicated electric kettle. Induction cooktops also have a lot to offer in other respects, like fast, even heating, way better temperature control than gas or traditional electric, being a lot safer (especially in homes with curious hands and paws), and just plain being cool. Although there’s downsides as well (some folks can’t stand the vibration noise, you have to get ferromagnetic cookware, etc.) so the choice isn’t necessarily right for everyone.
(That said I still use the dedicated electric kettle because I’m usually not in a hurry and I like the convenience/small footprint of its power base, and that base also works with my automatic milk frother so it serves a dual purpose for me. I also find the electric kettle much easier to clean.)
Sorry everyone didn’t grow up in a household where their caretaker cooker or knew how to cooked. Some of us didn’t grow up in a household with fresh fruits and produce. Some of us didn’t have the money to spend on a shit ton of garlic.
So how about enjoy the video instead of being a snobby bitch.
Also Julia Child would be ashamed of people behaving like that. Her whole deal was just... Making cooking accessible for people. Hell, she had a whole segment devoted to "oh, nobody taught you how to cook eggs? Here's how you do that." A significant part of her show was basics that people take for granted (and though the equipment may have changed somewhat, its still pretty helpful). My dad had busy parents who didn't have the time or knowhow to cook, and he learned from watching Julia Child. French cooking made easy, here's the basics everyone assumes you know but never taught you. And ever since, he's had a love of cooking.
Stop putting people down for not knowing basics. Everyone is a beginner at some point or another.
So confit is a way of cooking things, and it does marvellous things to many things.
You put stuff in oil and slow cook it. That’s confit. Garlic confit? Put it in oil and slow cook it. Chicken confit? You put it in oil and slow cook it.
(side note: confit historically means to preserve by cooking at a low temperature, (which often also meant a cure prior to cooking). So Fruit confit is fruit that’s been cooked at a low temperature in a very concentrated sugar solution, not in oil. Nowadays, confit usually just means cooking slowly in oil outside the context of fruit and does not imply a curing process)
Compared to deep frying, almost no moisture is lost, and the flavour is not changed via the maillard process because it doesn’t happen. There is no charring or searing done to the meat/whatever you’re confitting.
For veg in general, to confit them will cause them to become ultratender, as fibers and stuff will partially break down, cell walls will collapse, but no moisture will be lost. And their flavour will mostly remain; for garlic in particular, the hot garlicky taste, the result of the allicin, which is a result of crushing or chopping the garlic, will never come out. The chemicals will break down under that amount of heat.
The oil does not terribly seep into the food by the way; it’s already saturated with water, and unless that water leaves, the oil doesn’t have a place to seep into. It’s saturated already, and the result of connective tissue breaking down, or fibres breaking down, is less room for fluids. Which is why a carrot can be nice and dry, go into a hot oven, and come out floppy and moist, as the water inside can no longer be held by its inside, and available, unabsorbed water = wet.
You do get a thin layer of oil coating the outside of the food.
This means that confit’ing a food item is actually very close to steaming that item at a particular temperature, or cooking it sous vide; in either case, the item does not dry out and slowly reaches its final temperature.
no it’s not cutthroat kitchen or gordon ramsey it’s a documentary exploring the anthropological & historical significance of cooking, and the dangers of the mass industrialization of food.
and i misspoke it’s rated TV-14 (for language and nudity)
this guy is so fucking angry about sliced bread (justifiably) that he really came out on camera with this absolute banger of a quote:
“And this is really how capitalism usually works. It creates a problem, and rather than fix the problem, it creates a new business to solve the problem.”
utterly scathing and yes this is from a 60 minute documentary episode dedicated entirely to the subject of Bread
right ok so technically it’s not sliced bread butindustrial, mass-manufactured bread that is…causing problems. Here’s the theory as the show presents it:
For about ~10,000 years bread was a fucking staple of the human diet. we evolved to eat this food, our bodies, our societies were built on this food, but all of a sudden we’re seeing a rise in gluten sensitivity* (distinct from celiac disease). Aka our bodies are rejecting this food we’ve spent 100 centuries eating. Where is this coming from?
Well, a big part of it is probably that less than 100 years ago corporations changed the definition of bread. (Like, figuratively and literally, they petitioned the FDA to change the legal definition of bread so they could put in additives.) In fact, industrialization has changed the process and the ingredients used to make bread, to the point manufactured bread is a profoundly different product from what our ancestors knew as bread. Let’s start with:
1) The Process: For thousands of years, humans relied on naturally occurring wild yeast and bacteria found in the air to make (leavened) bread and bread starters (fermented dough used to “start” new loaves. hence the term “sourdough”). you can still do this at home–all it involves is leaving a mixture of water and flour lying around for a few days. notice something missing? that’s right, YEAST. this process of making bread involves yeast–yeast from the air around you–but it doesn’t involve concentrated baker’s yeast. Baker’s yeast refers to various strains of yeast that are added directly to flour & water mixtures as a leavening agent. This allows the bread to rise more quickly and cuts down on the overall production time. Convenient, right?
Now, adding yeast is not automatically a bad thing, and bakers have been doing it for a damn long time in interesting ways (such as using yeast from beer brewing). But lately we’ve taken it to extremes–we’ve gotten too good at creating more and more efficient forms of commercial Baker’s yeast, specifically for industrial use on a mass scale. Manufacturers want bread to rise as fast as possible, because that is how you get more product on the shelves. Making bread in factories now takes asmall fractionof the time it used to.
And why is this a problem? Because it turns out a more traditional “long fermentation process allows bacteria to fully break down the carbohydrates and gluten in bread, making it easier to digest and releasing the nutrients within it, allowing our bodies to more easily absorb them.” [1] This (added to the fact that some commercial breads contain extra added gluten) has the unfortunate result that the product you buy from the grocery store is less digestible and nutritious than the bread human societies traditionally relied upon. Hence the rise of gluten intolerance–the gluten we are eating is simply more difficult to toleratethan gluten in properly fermented bread. (This is the reason many people with gluten sensitivity don’t experience symptoms when eating more traditionally made, longer-fermented sourdough.)
That’s not the only issue though. There’s also:
2) The Ingredients. not just the countless additives, but specifically: the flour. See, a grain of wheat is…incredibly nutritious, honestly. It has almost everything we need to sustain life and health. Civilizations did–and do–rely on bread as a fundamental dietary staple, to the point that you can track political instability with rising wheat prices. It’s essential. Look at this:
In a single grain, the essence of life.
So yeah, wheat is nutritional. We can build bodies and civilizations out of wheat. But it’s also, like…super difficult to access that nutrition. Well, more so than with most foods. If you eat a handful of wheat grains, a spoonful of flour–your body can’t digest that, you get basically nothing out of that (also raw flour isn’t safe to consume, don’t do that). Unlike many crops, wheat relies on being carefully and correctly processed in order for the final product to be as nutritional as possible. As stated above, part of that process is about fermentation. Another part isthe quality of the flour, what it contains and how it has been milled and treated.
And that quality has changed a lot in just a century or two. Take white flour, for instance. White flour has been around for a long fucking time actually, but until the late 19th century it was considered a luxury item, a treat for the very wealthy. White flour was never considered a staple food–until industrialists learned how to manufacture it cheaply. [2] And then it was everywhere. And suddenly, surprise surprise, we started to see a rise in nutrition related illnesses. Because the bran and germ have been stripped away, white flour has only a fraction of the nutritional value of whole grain. But because this gives it a higher shelf life, it was more convenient (and profitable) for manufacturers. So when they learned about the health issues, what did they do? Go back to making healthier flour?
Pshaw. Of course not. No, instead they kept removing nutrients, then artificially adding them back in. And that is how we got enriched flour–flour which is still significantly less nutritious than whole wheat flour. [3] And this is what the previous quote about capitalism was referencing. The food industry created a problem, and rather than undoing the problem, they created a whole new business to “fix” it:
And thus came the mass rise of “enriched” foods.
Eat Wonder Bread! It has as much protein as roast beef! As much calcium as cottage cheese! As much iron as lamb chops! No need to eat real foods, when you can eat highly processed foods instead! Don’t cook your own meals, let trustworthy corporations feed you! Mass-produced factory foods are easy, are healthy! There will be literally no downsides or long-term repercussions to public health & wellness!
So yeah. Much of what we think of as “bread” is chemically and molecularly distinct from traditional bread, and is very different (and less nutritional) than what our ancestors were eating even just a century ago. (On an individual level, I’m not sure how to mitigate this, other than by purchasing the healthiest options available (e.g. whole wheat, sourdough), buying from small bakeries/farmer’s markets, or baking bread at home. Lately there has been a rise of small health-concious brands focusing on traditional fermentation and whole ingredients; some may be available in your area. But ultimately, it’s the entire wider system that needs to change.)
And there you have it! I have never been so incandescently furious about wonder bread. This documentary will do that to you–and will change your whole understanding of modern food. It’s a 4-part netflix series called Cooked (2016), based on Michael Pollan’s book of the same name. Most of the info above comes from the third episode, and is accurate to the best of my knowledge (but let me know if I got anything wrong).
*I want to be perfectly clear though, gluten itself is not inherently bad. It’s being demonized in the press on no scientific basis, just to push yet another diet fad. Unless your body has actual issues with gluten (e.g. celiac disease, gluten sensitivity) there are no proven benefits to eating gluten-free. There are, however, benefits to eating less processed, more nutritional (delicious delicious) bread.